bendavidson.co.uk Homepage
contact details
personal pagesprofessional pages
 
 
Psychiatric Nursing: Ethical Strife
Papers and chapters reproduced on the web
Full list of published work
Index
1/Synopsis of text
2/
Authors' profiles
3/Overview of:
  • Section 1 - Social Relations
  • Section 2 - Individual Struggles
  • Section 3 - Ideology
  • 4/
    Editorial intros to chapters
    5/
    Marketing and purchase details, and website links

     

    cover


    Click the image above
    to buy a copy of Ethical Strife at Amazon.co.uk.

    Buy best price books
    (also CD's, e-gadgets etc.)
    at Amazon and make Ben some commission

    In Association with Amazon.co.uk

    Click here to return to
    main page for
    'Ethical Strife'

      

    4/ Editorial introductions

    Chapter 16 - Trying to Treat the System: dominance and negotiation in family therapy by Chris Stevenson

    Chris Stevenson concludes the second section of the text, highlighting the interplay of the themes developed thorough the preceding two groups of chapters: There has to be a personal struggle to develop an ethical practice; and one may employ specific means in order so to develop.

    A patient exists as part of a family or other social system, as well as manifesting a number of internal systems such as cognitive schema, object-relational structures, endocrinological processes and so on. Clearly, a strong therapeutic prejudice by a clinician is likely to influence which part of the system is identified as well, which part is identified as ill. No doubt many of the clinician's more personal characteristics will also play a part in this ascription of health and illness. In chapter sixteen Chris Stevenson explores the ethical and practical difficulties in avoiding such prejudice and enabling truly informed choice of therapeutic approach and treatment plan by clients. Using a clinical vignette of some family work in which she has been involved, Chris explores the way systems theory can help in working with the group as a whole rather than one or another member. She discusses the advantages of this way of working. She also highlights the dilemma about whether this way of working itself allows free choice by individual members of the group, or an element of coercion. She reinforces the idea that a strong sense of openness to feedback from colleagues, in the context of a supervision group, offers some protection from ethical 'blind-spots' in this respect.



    Copyright 1992-2002 Ben Davidson. All rights reserved