|
| |
4/ Editorial introductions Chapter 22 - The
Ethics of Purchasing a Self by Vincent
Deary Current trends in therapeutic intervention
take on a particular light when set against the backdrop of the massive demographic,
political and socio-economic changes seen over the last decade. Not only do brief
psychotherapies appear cost effective in relation to particular outcome criteria
in individual clients and local budget constraints. They may also serve to dissipate
belief in the state's responsibility in certain areas, by locating the source
of clients' problems in their attitudes to life and responsibility for their plight
within their individual sphere of influence. In chapter twenty two, Vincent Deary
examines these and other aspects of the current trend within the NHS of purchasing
brief, individually focussed therapies. This paper considers
the three main therapeutic modalities and their development as ideology, rather
than offering what may be seen as a complete account of all the schools. In this
way, this chapter highlights the most crucial point of section three, which is
to encourage the reader to look at how ideology is influencing their experience
and their belief in this or that (apparently) moral principle. It may, after all,
not be a moral principle at all, but simply ideology that one has been induced
to introject. Vincent does not seek to argue that one is gullible for having done
this - after all, there are vast philosophical, scientific, cultural, financial,
religious and other interests at play, and at play over a long period of history,
in developing the ideology. Particular therapeutic ideologies have almost become
an ethical touchstone for those of us subscribing to them, so that it is possible
to blind ourselves to any merits of the alternatives. In this respect, Vincent
exposes his own position in the enmeshed hierarchy of interest and professional
status, describing his experience of work as a behavioural nurse psychotherapist,
exposing also the dread that scrutiny of these issues induces in him as one person
trying to sort out the chaff of ideology from the wheat of clear judgement about
what is right and fitting in the care of the mentally ill.
|